Donald Trump Doubles Down on Boorish Temper Tantrums
Get the Full StoryPresident Trump was busy during his early morning "Fox & Friends" time. Around 6 am there was this:People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!
— Donald J. Trump realDonaldTrump June 5, 2017
The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C.
— Donald J. Trump realDonaldTrump June 5, 2017
First he deliberately undermines his own Justice Department by needlessly calling his immigration EO a "travel ban." Why? Because he got criticized for accidentally doing this over the weekend, and by God, that means he needs to double down. Having done that, he then proceeds to slam the Justice Department as if they worked for someone else. If he wanted them to stay with the original travel ban, he should have told them to. If he wussed out, it's his fault, not theirs.
It's worth noting, by the way, that we're now in the fifth month of Trump's childish refusal to go ahead with new travel regulations while we wait for the courts to rule on his temporary travel ban that was meant to give him time to write new travel regulations.
Then, after a bit of random whining, Trump decides to back to the well on the mayor of London:
Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his "no reason to be alarmed" statement. MSM is working hard to sell it!
— Donald J. Trump realDonaldTrump June 5, 2017
Even for Trump, this is close to unbelievable. His original tweet about this yesterday was a lie, and would have been wildly inappropriate even if it weren't. The city of London just got hit by a deadly terrorist attack! Trump got blasted for this breathtaking display of churlishness, of course, and that meant he had to hit back even more boorishly in front of the whole world. Because Donald Trump never, ever, backs down from anything, no matter how stupid.
Holy hell. 43 months to go.
Share: