Illegal knee controversy: Emmett to appeal loss, Stephens misunderstood the rules

Get the Full StoryHere s everything you need to know about the controversy surrounding the finish on the UFC on FOX main event. Jeremy Stephens big main event win over Josh Emmett was in the middle of controversy due to what seemed like illegal shots that weren t called by the referee. The strikes in question were elbows to the back of Emmett s head, and also Stephens throwing a knee to a downed opponent.

Although Emmett was dropped and hurt by other legal strikes, these few specific shots as Stephens tried to finish were highly controversial. It had MMA twitter buzzing, and even UFC commentators arguing within themselves.

CORMIER ARGUES WITH CRUZ AND BISPING

Stephens indeed landed on the back of the head with elbows, but some argue that Emmett was also moving his head when it happened so it can be deemed as legal blows.

As for the legality of the actual knee itself, Dominick Cruz, a teammate of Stephens, argues that it doesn t matter as it didn t hurt Emmett, and it was the legal shots that finished the fight. As Cormier mentioned though, whether or not it was the most damaging shot or not it clearly wasn t it was still illegal.

Bisping and Cruz continued arguing with Cormier about the legality and whether it even landed, but the one thing they could agree on, was that it was on the referee not Stephens to stop the contest. Dan Miragliotta didn t do so, and the fight continued with Stephens finishing him a couple of seconds later.

Did Jeremy Stephens strike Josh Emmett with an illegal knee? dc_mma dominickcruz and bisping intensely debate the details of the main event! #UFCOrlando https: t.co cQxX5So9bb FOX Sports: UFC UFCONFOX February 25, 2018

STEPHENS MISUNDERSTOOD THE NEW RULES

The illegal knee wasn t thrown accidentally, or in the heat of the moment. Stephens spoke about his actions, saying it was clearly his intention to land the knee, but it seems like he has misunderstood the new rules that are in place.

He thought it was legal, and brought up a conversation he had with the referee about the rules briefing.

Dan Miragliotta came in the back before the fight . He said this is the new unified rules, Stephens said. He said that if two hands are down, you can lift one hand up to knee. If he s on his knees, and one hand is up, it s okay to throw a knee.

I m not a dirty fighter, I never have been my whole life. I saw an opportunity, and I was looking for it.

What the FOX crew didn t mention, was that there was likely a disconnect during that conversation Stephens mentioned. The new rule discussing one hand vs two hands only applies if the opponent is on his feet with his hand s touching the canvas. If the opponent is on his knees, like Emmett was, he is automatically a grounded fighter and he cannot be kicked or kneed in the head regardless of his hand position.

So while it seems like there was no malice in there, Stephens knee was intentionally thrown. It wasn t a poor decision made on the heat of the moment while trying to finish the fight. He saw an opening and he planned that illegal strike because he thought it wasn t against the rules.

In our full interview with lilheathenmma, Michael Bisping asks if it bothers him if people might think he's a dirty fighter..."As of tomorrow the money will hit my bank account. I am not worried." https: t.co CwQTJzFP2A FOX Sports: UFC UFCONFOX February 25, 2018

FABER BLASTS CRUZ AND BISPING FOR OVERLOOKING THE KNEE

Urijah Faber was watching as the fighters and commentators argued about the knee, and the Team Alpha Male founder took to social media to rip both Cruz and Bisping.

Dominick Cruz and Michael Bisping are f king blind, Faber said on Instagram. That was a knee to the back of the head. An illegal knee to the illegal back of the head. Give me a friggin break. Congratulations to Stephens. He fought a good one.

Gimme a break! Feel for joshemmettufc, congrats lilheathenmma but that was an illegal knee. A post shared by Urijah Faber urijahfaber on Feb 24, 2018 at 7:20pm PST

EMMETT TO APPEAL LOSS

Faber and Team Alpha Male obviously weren t happy about the controversial sequence, and the team has informed MMA Fighting that they plan to appeal the loss.

Had the referee intervened and deemed those shots as fouls, Stephens could ve been warned or had a point deduction, and the fight would ve been restarted. If Emmett wasn t able to continue, it could ve been a no contest or a disqualification. If instant replay was available, the referee could ve called to review the fight ending sequence only to check for fouls. That could ve led to a technical decision, a no contest, or a disqualification.

That of course wasn t done, and instant replay isn t allowed by the Florida Commission, so Team Alpha Male will just appeal to the loss. If they were to win that appeal, the fight would likely be overturned to a no contest, not a disqualification.

TL;DR RECAP

Were the elbows illegal? At least one landed on the back of the head, but legality could be debated.

Was the knee illegal? It didn t land flush, but yes.

The knee was also intentional, but this all falls on the referee though, not Stephens.

Will the fight be overturned? Who knows? I guess we ll find out soon.

This new dis-unified rules are still confusing to many, and instant replay really should be available for fight ending sequences.

Share: